My Photo

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

April 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Blog powered by Typepad

Become a Fan

« #SpyReboot | Main | G2 | Sensemaking and its 7 Secret Sauces »

January 13, 2014


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Bold thinking Jeff !
I suspect the tide of change within conventional thinking, would take decades to for government policies to change.its a shame that policy and implementation can't react as expeditiously as business.
Cheers to the white hat gentlemen that have secured their capabilities within such a bureaucratic entanglement, they will live long and prosper.
To those that challenge the conventional paths, cheers to you , may the force be with you! We draw upon it daily!


Interesting but why should taxpayers fund the security analysis of private companies?

Brian Layton

Jeff - interesting - but I think your ideas were the genesis of the NSA-CYBERCOM being run by the same individual. Your white hat concepts seem best for CYBERCOM half.
As you mentioned - it seems there is a natural tension between the two organizations but how does the US Government ensure the collaboration between the two.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)